A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2020, at around 00:17, the Defendant: (a) reported on May 9, 2020 that “A person who fessing a drinking beverage” in front of B Apartment apartment C, and “A person who fessing a drinking beverage” was committed by the police officer affiliated with D Zone D Zone D District, a police officer called out, after receiving a report on 112, to listen to the circumstances of the case against the reporter; and (b) assaulted the chest of the said police officer on his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements, assaults, video CDs against E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. All circumstances, including the fact that there is a past record of being punished three times by a fine for an violent crime including the reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, the degree of interference with public duties, and the execution of official duties: Provided, That there is no past record of the punishment exceeding the fine; and