logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.05.10 2019고단219
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 21, 2018, at around 01:30 on November 21, 2018, the Defendant damaged that the sum of repair costs would be KRW 500,000,000, by taking the following grounds: (a) the Defendant collected daily and alcoholic beverages from a “C” restaurant located in Seodaemun-gu B and 2, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; and (b) the Plaintiff, a victim D-owner of the said restaurant, collected a restaurant table, a contact table, etc.; and (c) the mebbbbbbbs, etc., to the end.

2. The Defendant received 112 reports at the above date, time, and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and told F of the police officer F of the Seoul Western Police Station Estation, who called the above restaurant, to the said restaurant, that “I am son, I am son?” and assaulted F’s bridge part of the above F F’s bridge to walk on the floor of the above restaurant at several times.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials.

3. At around 02:00 on November 21, 2018, the Defendant damaged public goods, on the ground that he did not unsatisfe his checks at the Seoul Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western Police Station Esatisfa (Seoul Seodaemun-gu) Police Station Esatisfa, and, on the other hand, the Defendant took the bath of “satfa, satfa,” and, on the other hand, got the water purifiers installed within the said police box to go beyond the strings, so that all of the water purifiers parts of the water purifiers are separated and the paper cup, which was contained in the custody of paper cup, cannot be used.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the articles used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs and E boxes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

arrow