The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The defendant and the victim C (the age of 64) in the facts charged are between the workplace fellows serving at the D hotel.

On September 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 15:10 on September 20, 2012, in the parking lot for the D hotel staff in Daegu Suwon-gu E, franchising the victim’s franchising, and franchising about 5 times with the parked vehicle, and caused the victim’s injury of the debris that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant asserts that, since the investigative agency, up to this court, there was a conflict between the two issues concerning parking management in a hotel, and that, in turn, the Defendant did not have committed an assault against the victim, and that there was no possibility that the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim.

In this case, there are statements of victims, injury diagnosis certificates, and inquiries about the head of the Dong-affiliated Hospital as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case.

However, according to the records of this case and the hearing of this court, ① the victim acknowledged the fact that the victim was at the time when the victim was the defendant and the defendant in charge of hotel room after the occurrence of this case, ② the victim asked whether the police officer dispatched after receiving the report after the fact that the victim was assaulted or was injured by the victim, ② the victim stated that he was not injured by the victim, but the victim was the suspect, and the defendant was sent to the scene of the victim. ③ The victim made a report on the dispatch of the victim to the police as the suspect, ③ the victim was asked by the police, and the victim was sent to the victim. However, while the victim was asked by the police, the victim was able to be seen by the defendant, and the victim was able to take the vehicle along with the defendant, and the victim went to the parking lot, and the defendant went to the parking lot.