A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around August 29, 1997, the Defendant, as an operator of the “C” in Kimpo-si B, entered into a family check contract with the erroneous branch of the foreign exchange bank under the name of the Defendant and entered into a check transaction from around that time.

[2013 Highest 865]

1. On November 23, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number “S”, “S” date of issuance,” and “3,000,000 won” under the Defendant’s name, and issued a check on April 22, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentment for payment. However, the Defendant offered a check on April 22, 2013, which was within the said time limit for presentment for payment, but did not pay the check.

2. On November 23, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number “T”, “T” date, “3,00,000 won” under the Defendant’s name, and issued one copy of the said bank check under the Defendant’s name, which was the date of issuance, and issued the said check on April 22, 2013 during the period for presentment of payment. However, the Defendant offered a payment proposal on April 22, 2013, which was within the period for presentment of payment. However, the said check was not paid as a non-transaction (cancellation of a check).

[2013 Highest 1002]

1. On November 21, 2012, the Defendant issued one check number “C”, “U” date, “C,00,000 won” under the Defendant’s name, and issued one check under the Defendant’s name, which is the date of issuance, and “3,00,000 won”. The Defendant issued the check on April 30, 2013, which is within the time limit for presentment for payment. However, the prosecutor stated this part as “insufficient deposit” in the bill of indictment. However, according to the records, it is apparent that it is erroneous in writing, and it is not deemed that this part affects the Defendant’s right of defense. Thus, the correction is made as above.

the check was not paid.

2. On November 22, 2012, the Defendant issued a copy of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which was named as “C” office, “V”, “date of issuance”, “3,00,000 won”, and “3,00,000 won”, and the Defendant issued the check on May 10, 2013, which is within the time limit for presentment of payment by the holder.