logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.07.24 2013고단1761
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, from May 28, 1997, entered into a check contract with the new bank Anyang Central Branch and a current account in the name of the Defendant and entered into a check transaction.

A. On July 23, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank bank bank bank bank bank bank bank bank check in the name of the Defendant as of November 15, 2013, which was named as "E number, par value,00,000 won at the "D office" in the Defendant's operation of the Defendant located in Ansan-si Office C at Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the date of issuance, and issued one copy of the bank bank bank bank check from that time until September 23, 2013, as shown in attached Table 1, and each holder presented a payment proposal within the time limit for payment, but no payment is made due to the suspension of transaction.

B. Around September 23, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number “F”, “3,00,000,000”, “F”, “3,000,000” under the Defendant’s name in the D office operated by the Defendant at Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, and issued one copy of the bank household check under the Defendant’s name as of December 16, 2013 as of the date of issuance. On the same day, each holder issued a sum of KRW 27,00,000,000 in the sum of nine face value of the household check as shown in attached Table 2, and presented a payment proposal within the period of presentation for payment, but no payment was made due to non-transaction (suspension).

C. Around September 23, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number “G”, “3,00,000,000”, “one copy of the above bank bank check in the name of the Defendant as of January 31, 2014” in the D office operated by the Defendant at Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and issued one copy of the bank bank check in the name of the Defendant as of January 31, 2014, as indicated in the attached Table 3, and presented the payment to each of the holders within the period for which the payment was presented, but the payment was not made due to the suspension of transaction.

2. Even if the check issued for determination is refused to be paid on the date of presentment, the reasons for refusal of payment are insufficient, due to suspension of transactions or cancellation or termination of check contracts.

arrow