1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s transaction relation (1) is a merchant who manufactures and sells household products, etc. with the trade name “C” in Seoul.

The defendant has a main office in Busan and aims at the development, distribution, etc. of educational informatization projects, educational assistive equipment and equipment, etc.

(2) The electronic table is a video image education system that changes the sign(s) from electronic fences, fingers, etc. to electronic signals on the monitors of blost PC so that they can consular (power) in the project, TV screen, etc.

The basic structure is the core of the electronic equipment realizing cinematographicization, and the plaintiff has designed, manufactured, and supplied the outer and inner parts of the electronic table table in accordance with the demand of each company from the electronic equipment companies including the defendant.

(3) Around August 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the manufacture of electronic tampers and electronic tampers, etc. and for the supply of them to the Defendant, and began transactions by receiving advance payment of KRW 25,663,00 from the Defendant.

B. On January 1, 2010, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to design and manufacture one unit of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model of the model.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff sent to the head of the Defendant’s headquarters D and the director E several estimates of 100 electronic consignment cases (hereinafter “instant product”) by e-mail, stating “(100) minimum quantity of orders (2% per 100 vehicles when ordering orders) in the remarks column,” and agreed on the design, design, unit price, etc. at any time.

After that, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to supply 100 goods of this case to KRW 75,00,000, and the Defendant requested so.