The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (fine 6 million won) is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the following: (a) the instant crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as an act that circumvents the legitimate exercise of public authority and undermines the function of the State’s legal order and order; (b) the police officer damaged by the Defendant’s act was injured by the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant had a large number of criminal records, even if considering the economic situation of the Defendant, the sentence imposed on the Defendant for the reasons indicated in its reasoning

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, ex officio, the deletion of “the fact that the defendant has a criminal record of violence,” in the 2-3th sentence of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected.