The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) was too unreasonable, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in this case requires strict punishment as an act impeding the legitimate exercise of public authority and impeding the function of the State’s legal order, the Defendant has a large number of criminal records of the same kind, and in particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the suspension of execution being sentenced to a suspended sentence due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on March 26, 2020, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, even if considering the Defendant’s family relation and economic circumstances, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant for the reasons stated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.