The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that it was unfair for the Defendant to be sentenced to punishment of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment with prison labor), each of the instant crimes was committed by the Defendant, which interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by using violence against the police officer, and at the same time, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the course of the crime and its method, etc.; the crime obstructing the performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished as an act hindering the exercise of legitimate public authority and undermining the function of the State’s legal order; the Defendant has a large number of criminal records and several criminal records; and the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was committed during the suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, even if considering the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victimized police officer, the Defendant’s health condition, family relations, etc., it cannot be

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.