Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant is not a narcotics handler.
1. On December 12, 2016, at around 01:00, the Defendant administered meconium C, which is a local mental medicine medicine, possessed by C, together with C, at the Defendant’s residence located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B 101, by means of dilution approximately 0.2g of the meconium (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”).
2. On January 8, 2017, the Defendant purchased penphones by means of giving C with approximately 300,000 won of penphones and receiving approximately 0.15g of penphones from C from the mutual influenites in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
3. The Defendant administered approximately 0.15g of philophones, which were possessed with C, at the time and place described in paragraph 2, in the same manner as Paragraph 1, at the time and place.
4. The Defendant: (a) around January 12, 2017, the Defendant: (b) provided D’s vehicle stopped on the front road of the Defendant’s residence with KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
5. The Defendant administered approximately 0.3g of philophones, which were possessed by the Defendant in the dwelling of the Defendant at the time of the daylight as described in paragraph 4, in the same manner as Paragraph 1.
6. On January 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around low time, the G hotel run on the G hotel located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, provided D with KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
7. The Defendant administered approximately 0.1g of philophonephones, which were possessed as above, in the mutual influence in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, in the manner described in paragraph 6, by the method described in paragraph 1.
8. On February 9, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of philophones, which were in possession of the Defendant’s residence with the same background as that of paragraph 6, in the same manner as Paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;