logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.28 2015나107043
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The defendant on December 25, 1992 with respect to the land size of 1096 square meters prior to Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The registration conversion, partition, and replotting were completed between the 1977 and 1982 in the Seosan-gun K-gun K-Tun 4 group 6 group 3 group 4 group 4 group 4 group 4 group m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m. (or m m m m

Division ( March 31, 1978) - K 4 6 m2 K - K 4 m2 4562 m2 (the unit conversion of April 27, 1977) - N 4620 m27 m2172 m20 m20 m204 m204 m204 m224 m224 m224 m224 m294 m294 m297 m298 m27 m298 m297 m27 m297 m27 m297 m297 m27 m297 m27 m298 m27 m297 m297 m27 m297 m27 m297 m31,1978) on the instant land under the name of 293 m3194 m27.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statement in Gap's evidence 3 through 7 (including the serial number) and the purport of the entire argument to the effect of the claim shall be determined depending on the nature of the source of right, but if the nature of the source of right is not clear, the possessor is presumed to have occupied the source of right in peace and openly and openly with his/her intention pursuant to Article 197 (1) of the Civil Act. Thus, the possessor is not actively responsible for asserting and proving that the source of right is the owner of right and the possessor's possession is the owner.

arrow