Defendant

C Imprisonment for eight months, the defendant A shall be punished by a fine of eight thousand won.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A and C did not have traded steel with each other. As such, Defendant A and C engaged in processing trade as if G supplied steel to H operated by Defendant C and received false tax invoices. Accordingly, Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 20 million by the same court on September 26, 2014, for a period of one-year suspension of execution, due to the violation of the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act at the Incheon District Court, and two-year suspension of execution, and Defendant C was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million by the same court on November 21, 2015.

1. On July 2015, the Defendant C (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” in this paragraph) phone called to the said Defendant, who was the business director of G, a corporation, at the early stage of the police officer, at the place of early July 2015, and there was no processing transaction between H and G, which had been tried at this time.

Recognizing the purport that the testimony was made to the effect that there was no processing transaction by attending as a witness because of the fact that there was an assertion, the court decided that the above A had been present at the Incheon District Court Decision 2015, 473, as a witness of the Defendant’s violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, and had the Defendant feel

Since then, upon the Defendant’s request, the above A was present at the court of Incheon District Court 322, 163, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, 2015, 163, as the witness of the above case, and there was no processing transaction between G and H, and there was no fact that only the tax invoice was issued without the real transaction. It was merely a loan of money by G to return all the money received from H as the price for the goods at the Defendant’s request.

“Admonishment” was raised.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated the above A with perjury.

2. Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” in this paragraph) is the legal court of Incheon District Court No. 322, located on July 21, 2015, the Nam-gu Incheon District Court No. 1324, Nam-gu, Incheon, and according to the teachers of the above C, such as the statement in paragraph (1), the above court is 2015 and 473 Defendant C.