logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.27 2015고단5227
의료기사등에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of each of the facts charged in this case

(a) No person, other than medical technicians, etc., shall perform duties, such as medical technicians, etc., who are at least 5227 higher rank (Violation of the Medical Technicians, etc. of Defendant A) 2015;

Nevertheless, around April 14:20, 2015, the Defendant, at F dental clinics located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, performed the duty of removing booms, such as urine, to G, who is the patient, even though he is not a dental technician, while serving as a nursing assistant.

B. At around August 11, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on Medical Technicians, etc. of the said court No. 2015 and 1757, at the court of Incheon District Court No. 322 located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, as a witness, around August 11, 2015.

In fact, despite the Defendant’s lying G patients on a chair, the Defendant did not have “satisfing only once” in the above 322 court.

In response to the prosecutor’s question, “Toe” was answered to the prosecutor’s question, and the witness testifieded to the effect that, at the time of the control of this case, only he was engaged in the preparation work for the Scheduleing and did not conduct the Schedule to the effect that, “At the time of the control of this case, the witness respondeded to the attorney’s question, “it is necessary to confirm whether the water would work well in a manner that the water would work well before the Scuring outside of the Scuring.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

(2) On September 15, 2015, Defendant B appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Medical Technicians, etc. Act No. 1757, Dec. 15, 2015, at the court of Incheon District Court No. 322 located in Nam-dong, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and 2015.

In fact, although the defendant confirmed that A was able to place G patients on the chair and take the care of G patients, the defendant's defense counsel at the above 322 court, "no nurse or nursing nurse may be engaged in any work to the extent that he/she does not sing and perform any work to the extent that he/she does not do so."

arrow