Of the crimes of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, the crime No. 1 to No. 8 in the annexed crime list shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two months, and the decision No. 1 in the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 22, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution as a result of interference with the execution of official duties at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 3, 2018.

[Criminal facts] The defendant has a claim against AB, and the victim N (V, 51) is a person living together with AB.

The defendant alleged that AC operated by the injured party is actually owned by AB, and the house and AC of the injured party have been found more than three times to urge the injured party to repay the debt.

1. On April 6, 2018, the Defendant who intrudes upon a residence: (a) on the second floor of the victim in Daegu-gu M on April 6, 2018; (b) twice the entrance door frighted through stairs; and (c) the victim frighted to drinking, i.e., the victim “a person.”

Recognizing so called “I cannot answer but continue to open the door until the police called upon the victim’s report, thereby undermining the peace of residence, as well as undermining the peace of residence. From January 16, 2018 to April 6, 2018, the entrance was opened twice twice at the entrance of the second floor of the victim’s second floor more than 14 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and actually harming the peace of residence of the victim.

2. A person who collects claims in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act shall not seriously harm privacy or peace in business by repeatedly or at night visiting an obligor or his/her related person without justifiable grounds in connection with debt collection to arouse fear or apprehension;

From January 16, 2018 to April 6, 2018, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to repay the debt owed by AB, a person living together with the victim, as the preceding paragraph, and opened several doors before the second floor entrance of the victim’s house. Upon the police officer’s restraint, the Defendant: (a) before AC’s operation of the victim on the first floor of the building, the Defendant called “induction of money; (b) Domination of the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation and the rule of no taxation