logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단2878
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above sentence against Defendant B for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A and G (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) of the Defendants’ public offering play the role of soliciting real estate buyers and real estate-backed owners; Defendant B provided false employment and income documents; and arranging real estate security loans; H (Seoul Southern District Court, May 13, 2016, punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud in the Seoul Southern District Court) takes charge of the role of providing one year and April 13, 201 for the purpose of purchase and sale of apartment and loan contracts for the purpose of acquiring money in the absence of an intention to acquire the right of lease; and (b) purchased apartment on the ground of false employment and income documents, etc.; and (c) offered several types of public offering to sell and sell the real estate with the intention of acquiring the right of lease.

Therefore, the Defendants, along with the H introduced through G on June 27, 2013, demanded H to prepare a real estate transaction agreement with H to purchase L Apartment No. 1906 Dong 201 from K to 245 million won for the loan of H, and directly reside after the termination of the previous lease agreement related to the apartment security value.

“The” made an application for a loan to the effect that the loan was made.

However, in fact, Defendants and H did not have the intent or ability to repay the above loans, and H did not actually reside in the above apartment and did not intend to purchase the apartment by paying to the aboveO only the difference after deducting the deposit of 170 million won from the purchase price under the condition that they succeed to the previous lease contract.

Accordingly, Defendants H et al.

arrow