Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall assault, threaten, or induce any elector, candidate, or person who intends to become a candidate, chief of an election affairs liaison office, chief of an election affairs liaison office, assistant to an election affairs clerk, person in charge of accounting, campaign speechmaker, or elected person, illegally arrest or detain him/her, or seize goods used for an election campaign under the Election of Public Officials Act.

around 07:41 on April 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 07:41, on the street in front of the exit of No. 1, 204-14 located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 2017, the Defendant 5 (5) of the office members, including three party election clerks, including the three party election clerks, and two election clerks, including E, who are working in the election campaign; (b) whether he/she has a political effect;

Da, G whether they become political parties;

니 년들이 뭘 아느냐,

니 년들이 선거를 알아 뭘 알아서 꺼져 버려, 헬멧으로 때려 버릴까 ”라고 말하고, 손에 들고 있던 오토바이 헬멧으로 위 선거 사무원들을 때릴 듯한 행동을 하여 선거 사무원을 협박하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (to attach a copy of the table of 112 report processing case), report internal investigation (to hear victim C's statement of damage), investigation report (to hear the statements of shots H)

1. Article 237 (1) 1 of the Election of Public Officials Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of five million won to thirty thousand won; and

2. Setting the sentencing criteria not;

3. The Defendant, on the ground that he carried out an election campaign excessively so as to be prone, threatened election clerks who are engaged in the election campaign, to the extent that he can be seen as working in a bopis.

At the time, the defendant appears to have been highly shocked by the election clerks.