beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,475,630 as well as 5% per annum from July 10, 2015 to November 7, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 03:40 on July 10, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a B Costex vehicle and driven the 3rd line road at the entrance of the Daejeon Jung-gu Round road along the middle-gu Round road along the two-lanes from the negative distance to the rooftop; (b) concealed the part behind the vehicle owned by C, which was parked on the three-lanes, into the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle while driving along the two-lanes; and (c) transferred the said vehicle to the front part of the vehicle; and (d) proceeded with the part behind the FF vehicle under the E-owned ownership. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the downbru, etc., due to plebing, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the foregoing D vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
[Grounds for recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 8, Eul 2, 4, 7, and 8 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the facts of recognition of two responsibilities as a whole, the plaintiff's negligence caused the accident of this case by failing to perform his/her duty of Jeonju City, as a whole.
In addition, the defendant's vehicle has a duty to keep the driver of another vehicle easily recognizable by using the taillight and the sidelights at night, and to park it at the right edge of the roadway so that it does not interfere with other traffic, but is negligent in violating this duty.
In addition, the location of the instant accident occurred is three-lanes of the three-lane road among the three-lane roads, the Defendant’s vehicle parked on the road without parking, contributing to the occurrence and expansion of the damage caused by the instant accident. At the time of the instant accident, there were street lights, etc. due to the rare night time zone.
Even if there is an obstacle to securing the view, there is a proximate causal relationship between the negligence of the defendant vehicle and the occurrence of the accident in this case.
In this respect, this case.