logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.11.10 2016고단8494
업무방해등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, who interfered with Defendant A’s business of Defendant A from around 00:50 on August 26, 2016 to around 01:05, 15 minutes from the main point of “F” located in north-gu, Busan for about 15 minutes (around 15 minutes from the main point of “F” (the main point of this case where the victim B is the president; hereinafter “the main point of this case”) to operate the main station of “F”, the main station of “B” to which the victim carried alcohol together with “B” G, and the victim shouldered the Defendant “B”.

“In doing so, brooms (hereinafter “brooms”) with the face of the victim, the victim’s face part and the side part of the victim’s face were sealed once by hand, and the broom containing an empty beer’s disease were stored on the floor, so that the brooms were destroyed by the brooms.

Accordingly, Defendant A interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. Defendant A’s assault against Defendant A: (a) at the time and place described in the foregoing paragraph; (b) on the same ground as the description mentioned in the said paragraph, Defendant A kept the victim’s face sides and the side gate of the victim’s B (age 57 years of age) one time; (c) dump with the victim and dump, dump with the victim; and (d) dumped the victim over the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

[In regard to this, Defendant A/Defense Counsel: (a) that Defendant A did not spawn the victim by hand, or spawn and spabling the spath; and (b) the victim did not spac

DaNN

However, in full view of the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the summary of the evidence of the above assault can be sufficiently recognized, and the above assertion by the defendant A/ his defense counsel does not bring any reasonable doubt about the acknowledgement of the crime

1. Part of Defendant A’s legal statement (Interference with the business)

1. The legal statement of the witness H, the witness B and G part of the legal statement;

1. Application of the investigation report (at least 1, 16) and each photograph/cinematographic output statute;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow