logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.04.21 2017고정114
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 400,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2016, the Defendants: (a) around 20:0 on October 18, 2016, at the bottom of the multiple parallels of around 160, Seocheon-ro, Daejeon, Daejeon, Seocheon-ro, 160, the Defendants did not enter Defendant B with their constitutional clothes and have good dancing.

“On the ground of the fact that it is not in vain, the Defendant committed assault to the victim, such as “the victim saw to be “h” in the year without this cover, frightened by her hand, and sphered to be sphered, and sphered by her hand, “the year in which she is not sphered,” and her hand sping off the part of the victim’s flabing by her hand, her flabing off, her flab by her hand, her flabing the flab, her blab by her hand, her flabing the blab by hand, her flading the part of the victim’s flab by her hand over the next floor, and her flabing the part of the victim’s flab by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly caused the victim to be injured by a multi-lateral typology that requires treatment for a period of 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the site and suspects;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts: Defendants who choose a punishment: Article 2 of the same Act and Article 257 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the Defendants B and the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Although Defendant B’s assertion was recognized that he saw the victim’s bath, scam, scam, and bucks twice, Defendant B did not commit assault, such as opening the victim’s breath by putting the victim’s breath on hand as stated in the facts charged in this case, and cutting off the part of the victim’s breath on the floor, cutting off the part of the victim’s breath by hand, cutting off the part of the victim’s breath by hand, making the victim’s breath by drinking.

2. The evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.

arrow