Lee Ho-hun (Attorney Go-Gyeong et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

The head of the Incheon Veterans Branch Office

6.6.18

1. The defendant's disposition of disability grade rendered against the plaintiff on November 5, 2002 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

The same shall apply to the order.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 4, 2000, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was in service under one guard group on April 23, 2001 and faced with the front part of slots. On June 22, 2001, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital on the Doctrine on the Doctrine surface “On the Doctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine sctrine spary sctrine sctrine sctrine sp.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on March 26, 2002. The Plaintiff’s name of the Plaintiff’s medical person as a result of the review of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement “The first part of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons of Distinguished Service to the State” (hereinafter “Act”) was deliberated and decided on to be a person who was injured at the time of his injury, and on August 29, 2002, “Class 7 and 401” was determined as a result of a new physical examination conducted by the Seoul Veterans Hospital on August 29, 2002, but the Plaintiff appealed against this and applied for a physical examination conducted on October 30, 200, but the same “Class 7 and 401” was determined as a disability rating. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff on November 5, 2002 that there was no change in the disability rating.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 to 10, Eul No. 1 to 5

2. The legality of the instant disposition

A. The parties' assertion

Although the plaintiff is now facing the function of the right bridge due to extreme pain, it is erroneous for the defendant to judge the plaintiff to grade 7 by deeming the plaintiff as a person with a chronic disorder on the part of the state.

(b) Related statutes;

Attached Form is as shown in the attached Form.

(c) Fact of recognition;

(1)The symptoms of the combined franking symptoms;

① The term “multi-purpose Pain Syrome” means a kind of chronic pain disease caused by repeated external wounds, etc., symptoms consisting of a eromatic pain (proving pain only when shelshes an even in contact with shelshes), pain pain (clshes anger’s response to pain), flshes, flshes (lsheshes), flshes, flshes, flshes, flshes, and physical disorder in the Republic of Korea. The type is that the 3th stage of the development of the disease, “the 6th stage of the disease, flive pain, color change, physical disorder, physical disorder, etc., which is gradually different from that of the 3th stage of the disease,” and “the 3th stage of the development of the disease, flital pain or flateral damage to which the 6th stage of the 3th stage of the development of the disease, i.e., e., ch., g., g., g.

(2) Plaintiff’s symptoms

(1) The name of the Plaintiff’s illness appears to have occurred due to the type 1 “In the case of the Plaintiff, the credit occurring during the military service, the fixing of a glare, or the operation of a glare in a slot, which is caused by the operation of a glare,” and the level of progress is as follows: “The degree of progress of the Plaintiff’s disease is deemed to have occurred.”

[Ground of recognition] The evidence Nos. 12 and 13 of this Court, the result of the commission of physical examinations and fact-finding to the subsidiary hospital affiliated to the Macheon National University, and the result of the commission of physical examinations to the Seoul National University Hospital.

D. Determination

(1) According to the above facts, the Plaintiff is currently suffering from Type 1 “A” in the complex Mae-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Man-Ma

(2) On the above disability rating table 31, the defendant asserts that the defendant's 31th grade 31 of the above disability rating table "a single kne kne kne e e e e e e e e e e e e e e." means a patient who was cut off, and the plaintiff does not mean a patient who has cut off one e e e e e e e e.g., the plaintiff's e e e e., the above grade cannot be applied since the function disorder caused by the chronic disorder, and the defendant's e e e e e e e e e e e e e e.g., the defendant's e e e e e e e e e e e e e., the defendant's e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e.,".

(3) Therefore, the Defendant’s disposition of this case based on the premise that the Plaintiff’s disability rating falls under class 7 401 is unlawful.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Justices Kim Jong-soo