logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.04 2016노1155
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to all the evidence of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles), even if the defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the instant traffic accident and did not take measures such as aiding and abetting the victim, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case due to erroneous determination of facts and misapprehension of legal principles.

2. Determination

A. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C low-priced vehicle.

On November 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 10km from November 19, 2014, with one driver on the one-way road in Kim Jong-si D, and proceeded at a speed of 10km per hour from the bank to the direction of Jeonbuk bank.

In this case, there was a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and to accurately operate the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the upper left side of the victim F who walked on the right side of the road while entering the upper right side while moving the parked vehicle and pedestrians into the upper right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the Defendant suffered from the victim’s salt and tension in the climatic tensions, climatic salt and tensions, and other tensions, which require medical treatment for about two weeks.

B. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the part before the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, where the part of the tampt was shocked with the part before the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the statement of the report on the occurrence of the traffic accident (hereinafter “the part before the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle”).

arrow