logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.23 2015고정138
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Facts charged and the defendant's assertion thereof;

A. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving vehicles of C low-priced other vehicles.

On November 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 10km per hour from the bank to the north bank in the direction of the bank, driving on the one-way road in the front direction of Kim Jong-si, while driving on the two-way vehicle at a speed of 10km per hour.

In this case, there was a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and to accurately operate the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the damaged central line of the parked vehicles and pedestrians while entering the original lane, and shocked the left side of the victim F who walked to the right side of the road into the right side after the front side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though he suffered from the victim’s salt and tension in the climatic tension, climatic salt and tensions, and other tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

B. The defendant alleged by the defendant did not injure the victim.

2. In order to establish an offense provided for in Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the driver of the vehicle shall commit an offense provided for in Article 268 of the Criminal Act by vehicle traffic.

In other words, due to the driver's negligence in the course of duty, the result of the victim's injury should be caused.

In the instant case, as stated in the facts charged, whether the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the Defendant’s business injury and the traffic accident by negligence (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

There are statements in the victim F, witness G investigative agencies and this court and medical certificates prepared by the H of a herb doctor as well as the statement in the victim F, witness G investigative agencies and this court.

1) Priority;

arrow