logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.13 2015나40910
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the application of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The head of the second 11th office shall be appointed as "the authentic copy of the payment order".

(b) 2nd 14 to 20 parallels shall be done in the following manner:

First, the Defendant paid KRW 30,00,00 to the Plaintiff on March 28, 2014. ② On March 201, 2014, E, which had been engaged in the construction business with D’s trade name, paid KRW 20,000 to the Plaintiff on March 20, 201. ③ The Defendant’s accounting staff members paid KRW 15,00,000 from F’s deposit account in the name of the Plaintiff’s name and KRW 20,000, KRW 200, KRW 300, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 300, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 300, KRW 200, KRW 200, KRW 300, KRW 200, KRW 300, KRW 300, KRW 300, and each of the above arguments was asserted on June 11, 200.

arrow