logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.09.10 2019나63430
청구이의
Text

The part of the first instance judgment against the plaintiff shall be revoked.

In accordance with the selective claims added by this Court, the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The reasons stated in this part are as follows, except for the use or addition as follows, it is identical to the part on “1. Basic Facts” of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance "the right to sell the above apartment units" in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "the right to sell the above apartment units (hereinafter referred to as "the right to sell the apartment units of this case")", and the "Si at the time" in the first part shall be "at the time"

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance concluded a supply contract with a seller and a contractor, and concluded a supply contract (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) with a truster and a joint seller G Co., Ltd., H limited liability company (hereinafter “seller”) and a contractor F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “contractor”) and concluded an agreement on the payment of interest on intermediate payment (hereinafter “instant interest payment agreement”).

The third-party 5 to 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

“(4) On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s IBK Bank (hereinafter “Corporate Bank”) at the Defendant’s request.

(2) From October 15, 2015 to March 15, 2018, an intermediate payment of KRW 379,920,000 was granted six times from October 15 to March 15, 2018, and the intermediate payment was paid in full by depositing the said money into a deposit account in the name of the I Co., Ltd. designated by the seller. In the process, the seller paid KRW 16,631,00 of intermediate payment interest on behalf of the Plaintiff to the said lending bank in accordance with the instant interest payment agreement. The third part of the first instance judgment of the first instance judgment of the “201.7.3” in the third part of the third part of the third part of the first instance judgment of the “2016.7.3”, “The 18th letter support route” was read as “the text message.”

Article 20 and 21 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance provides that "any intent to pay part payments paid by the plaintiff at the time of payment or acceptance, etc. of the loan obligations shall not be disclosed at all."

arrow