1. Of the judgment of the court below, the part of conviction among the judgment of the court below and the part of acquittal as to the obstruction of the business of September 30, 201 shall be reversed.

In this case.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. From September 30, 201 to 24:00 on September 30, 2011, the Defendant interfered with business (the principal charge) (the Defendant, from around 23:00 on September 30, 201 to around 24:00 on September 30, 201, stated that G 58 million won is liable to the partner E of the victim’s partner, and that the victim “I ambling F funeral, I ambling F. F. F. H. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F., I ambling the victim’s name-free customers who were at the main charge, thereby interfering with the victim’s bar business business from around 30:00 to 50:0 on September 30, 2011, the Defendant, who was under the preliminary charge of intimidation, thereby obstructing the victim’s business from G 504:500 billion won.

B. From February 17, 2012 to February 17, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the business (the principal charge) of the Defendant: (a) from February 21, 2012 to February 00, 2012, the Defendant complained against the Defendant that the Victim D had a debt of 58 million won to the Victim E; and (b) from around 17, 2012 to around 01:0, from around 21:00 to around 200, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by avoiding disturbance, such as taking a place of business using mobile phones; (c) from around 201: (d) from around 201 to around 201: (e) from around 201 to around 201: (e) the date on which the Defendant threatened the Defendant with his/her duty by force of the victim by force.