A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence 1 to 32 shall be confiscated.

from the defendant 203,00 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;

A. On March 7, 2018, at around 00:05, the Defendant, even though not a person handling narcotics, issued a philophone to D’s psychotropic drugs, by making the psychotropic drugs-related Mebane C (one philophone; hereinafter referred to as “philophone”) under the influence of inception.

B. On March 4, 2019, at around 05:00, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of phiphonephones in a single-use injection machine at the residence located in Jung-gu, Busan, and F, and in a way of injecting them into arms by dilution with bio-waterways.

C. On March 6, 2019, at around 10:45, the Defendant carried 3.93g philophones by inserting them in vinyl bomers and disposable bomers.

2. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.;

A. At around 20:00 on March 4, 2019, the Defendant removed the tobacco leaves containing the marith of marijuana in the above residence, and then smoked by inserting the flapared tobacco leaves into the flapared tobacco, and inserting it into the flapar and inserting it into the flapared tobacco.

B. On March 6, 2019, around 10:45, the Defendant possessed marijuana 308.11g by inserting it in tobacco pipes, vinyl bags, vinyl bags, glass bottles, and plastics bottles, with a view to smoking 308.1g.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police and prosecutorial examination of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Requests for each appraisal, and a statement on narcotics appraisal;

1. Photographss, CDs, etc. following a CCTV course;

1. A report on investigation (the No. 16, 18, 38 of the evidence list);

1. Each photograph, record of seizure, list of seizure and the defendant and defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that the defendant delivered a penphone to D.

However, D's statement from the first investigative agency to this court is generally consistent, while the defendant's statement is not so, it is rather true that D's statement is not so, and D's speech is administered until D's risk of punishment is faced, and the defendant is dismissed.