logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.02.08 2017고단2637
강요등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2637] Defendant A participated in the H’s election campaign that took place at the local election on June 4, 2014 to G Gun, and Defendant A was engaged in activities as H’s counterparts, such as serving as advisory members in “I”, a group of acquiring committees, after H was elected as the head of G Gun.

The victim J served as the head of G military accounting division from July 2014 to July 2016, and U served as the head of G military accounting division from July 2016 to September 2017.

1. From October 24, 2015 to around the 25th day of the same month, Defendant A forced to enter into a government-funded material contract for natural timber railing from K, a friendly partner of G H, upon receipt of a request from K to enter into a contract for the government-funded material contract for natural timber railing with the L development project (third minutes). Defendant A demanded to enter into a government-funded material contract for natural timber railing among “L development project (third minutes)” with the victim J, a director in charge of G military accounting at the time.

Defendant

A A The above victim submitted a written estimate and the technical expert of the project and submitted a written estimate of the material contract for the supply of natural timber rail among “LL development project (third parts)” and had been requested by the G military fishery department, the competent department, from the G military fishery department.

Although N should enter into a contract with N and the defendant's request, it continued to enter into the above government-funded material contract with the MU, and if the injured party does not hear the defendant's oral statement, he did not disadvantage the above injured party's assignment or promotion.

Defendant A continued to see the above circumstances with the mind of having the victim exercise the pressure through K, which is the friendly life of G head of G H, and around that time, Defendant A told K to the above circumstances. H around October 26, 2015, at the underground parking lot of G military office around G military office, Defendant A loaded the victim into the vehicle of K operation and moved the victim to the interest direction in the future, and on the vehicle, Defendant A entered A’s horse;

The term "the conclusion of the agreement with the LAM" was called as "the victim would be at a disadvantage in the assignment or promotion of the victim if the victim would not hear his/her or his/her horses."

Therefore, frightening is a food.

arrow