1. The supplementary participation of the Defendant joining the Defendant is not permitted.

2. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

3...

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case, including the acknowledgement of the judgment of the first instance, are as follows: (a) revise or add the relevant part of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following 2; (b) supplement or add the judgment under the following 3; and even if considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant in this court, it is difficult to recognize that a contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant constitutes a false declaration of conspiracy is not sufficient to reverse the judgment of the judgment of the first instance; and (c) cite it as it is,

2. Revised parts

(a) 3 pages 7,8 of this Act are amended as follows:

F. The exchange rate of Won/US as of April 16, 2015, which was the date of the closing of the instant argument, is KRW 1,088.90.

(b) Deleted.

(c) add “(at least 7 and 8 evidence” to “the purpose” of the 3rd 10th 10th 10th :

D. According to the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s 623,58,585 won under the instant contract (i.e., USD 572,650 x 1,088.90 x 1,088) (i.e., the amount of claims for which the Plaintiff partially transferred to C on December 15, 2011 excluding KRW 267,221,39,337,189 (=623,558,585 - 267,221,396), among 341,734,614,614 won requested by the Plaintiff and damages for delay calculated on March 19, 201, the Defendant’s obligation to pay the Plaintiff a copy of the instant application and damages for delay calculated on March 19, 2011 by 35,37,387,585 -267,221,396).

(e) eliminates from January 29, 201 to 5 pages “, etc.” in the last parallel of 4 pages.

(f) revise the 5th parallel of “this Court” to “Seoul Central District Court”.

G. The defendant shall revise the 7th to 14th parallels as follows.