The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant served as a senior music teacher at a high school located in Ansan-gu, Busan-si, Busan-si in 2013, and the victim D (V, 15 years old) was a student of the first year in high school.

On August 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the music room on the fourth floor of the above high school; (b) at the music room on the fourth floor of the above high school; and (c) at the right bridge due to a bicycle traffic accident, the victim, who was late to enter the music class of the 6th school, “I have a degree of a degree of a degree of a degree of a degree of a student, who

“Along with the purport that the victim’s right-hand satis, the victim’s right-hand satis was forced to commit an indecent act against the victim, and the victim was forced to commit an indecent act more than five times in total from that time to September 17, 2013, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

2. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the finding of guilt is to be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge not having any reasonable doubt as to whether the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the interest of the defendant is to be judged as the benefit of the defendant.

In this case, the victim made a statement to the same effect as the stated in the facts charged in this case in an investigative agency and this court as follows, and the victim's statement to the effect that he prepared and delivered to the assistant principal of the high school that is not the victim (hereinafter "the school of this case") through E through the victim's mother to the defendant and the victim's mother, the defendant met the victim's bridge over five occasions (hereinafter "the defendant's bridge"), and the National Digital Pene Service established the credibility on the grounds that the victim's statement concerning the facts charged in this case was not proven to the victim's logic, consistency, body, and the transition disorder of the victim at the time of the occurrence of this case.