logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.26 2016노1220
위증
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant cannot be deemed to have made a false statement since he/she testified as he/she testified as his/her memory.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment with labor for four months and one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the Prosecutor testified that D, who appeared as a witness in the Daejeon District Court 2015 Godan1283, stated that D, who did not take a course of a degree after the 3 to 4th day of the case, could have judged D, and that D, who did not take a course of a degree of study after the 3 to 4th day of the case, did not know that D would have judged 3 to 4 days after the 3 to 3th day of the case.

석고보드 같은 것으로 깁스를 했는데 너무 긴 것을 대서 의사에게 1cm만 잘라달라고 했는데도 의사가 잘라주지 않아 내가 쇠톱으로 자르러 세종시에 있는 집에 왔다'는 취지로 진술한 사실, D이 2014. 11. 1. E병원에서 약 6주간의 치료가 필요한 무릎뼈의 (폐쇄성)골절 등의 병명으로 진단을 받아 오른 쪽 다리에 반 깁스(Long Leg Splint)를 한 후 알루미늄 목발 1쌍과 깁스용 신발을 지급받았고, 위 일자부터 병원에 입원하여 치료를 받다가 2014. 11. 7.경 처음 외출을 한 사실(수사보고에 첨부된 D에 대한 진료기록지, 간호기록지, 증거기록 192쪽-195쪽)이 인정되는바, 위 인정사실에 의하면 D이 2014. 11. 1. 무릎뼈 골절의 상해를 입은 이후 다리에 댄 부목 부분을 절단하기 위해 집으로 간 것으로 보이기는 한다.

However, the following circumstances recognized in accordance with the above evidence, i.e., (i) acknowledged that D moved to a house to cut the part of the body of a dance on the bridge in the examination of the witness, and (ii) "it was a situation in which it was impossible to see the register of a degree of a degree of study," and (iii) examined the village from the village to the house."

arrow