beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 30,678,427 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from October 26, 2017 to June 28, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The network D (hereinafter “the network”) is a E-employee who has subscribed to industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.
On December 19, 2014, while driving a cargo vehicle (F; hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) on the part of the Defendant’s front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (G; hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) was driving in the middle of Incheon in the direction of at least two lanes in the direction of Incheon, the Deceased caused an accident where Defendant B’s cargo vehicle (G; hereinafter “Defendant”) going around the Plaintiff’s front side of the vehicle in the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the event of a preceding accident by towing the H vehicle and towing the front side of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).
B. The Deceased died on the date of the instant accident, such as physical injury, heart damage, etc.
C. The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and paid bereaved family members of the Deceased’s bereaved family members KRW 137,910,120, and funeral expenses KRW 11,654,370 from March 24, 2015 to October 25, 2017.
(The deceased had two wife and two children, and the wife received insurance benefits). D.
Defendant C is the owner of the vehicle on the part of the Defendant, and the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract for the vehicle on the part of the Defendant.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. According to the statements and images (including paper numbers) of Gap's Nos. 3, 4, 8, and Eul's Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the accident of this case is deemed to have occurred by the negligence of the deceased and the defendant B, who violated the duty of care to accurately manipulate and operate the steering and steering system.