logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2017가단5201340
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 47,332,453 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from June 30, 2016 to November 28, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the driver of the vehicle C for filing a complaint (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is the insurer of D 25 tons car trucks (hereinafter “Defendant”) and the network E is the driver of the vehicle F2.5 tons truck (hereinafter “accident”).

B. The network G, which operated Cheongbu retail in Seoul, requested the network E engaged in private cargo business to transport chip.

On June 29, 2016, the network E driven an accident vehicle and loaded the network G to the chief of the steering force, and the two wave 20kgs purchased by the network G to the nearest interest area of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the Seoul departing from the two wave 20kgs and 854 gsnife in the cargo space.

C. Around 02:30 on June 30, 2016, the network E driven a vehicle involved in an accident, and passed three-lanes at a point of 280km (Scar, Scare, Scare, Scare, Scare, Scare) in the direction of the coast Highway, the front part of the vehicle involved in the accident, which was driven by the Plaintiff, was shocked by the front part of the vehicle involved in the accident.

(2) After the Plaintiff’s accident occurred, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was stopped on the three-lanes and the side of the said expressway, and the vehicle involved in the accident was stopped on the three-lanes of the said expressway. However, after approximately one-minutes, the Defendant’s vehicle was driven on and passing through the said expressway, the Defendant’s front part of the vehicle was shocked, and the Defendant’s vehicle was driven on the front part of the vehicle, and the vehicle involved in the accident and shocked the front part of the vehicle after the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The network E and the network G were killed on the site of the accident due to the injury of multiple, long-term damage.

H On May 19, 2017, the second accident was caused by “the occupational negligence in which he neglected the duty to accurately manipulate the front-time watcher, steering gear, etc.” and the judgment became final and conclusive as it is, on the one-year suspended execution of imprisonment without prison labor for the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death or Injury), which resulted in the death of the deceased.

E. Meanwhile, I, the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and his spouse, the Plaintiff’s spouse.

arrow