logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.20 2017가단517108
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally 26,098,818 won and the Defendants’ amounting to 5% per annum from September 11, 2015 to June 20, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts without dispute;

A. On August 11, 2014, at around 07:55, the freight truck B driven by Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) proceeds from the access road to the relevant industrial complex to Busan Myeon (the direction of the navigational approach) in the vicinity of the Si/Yong-Eup, such as the indication of the site map in the attached Form No. 11, on August 11, 2014, from the boundary of the Si/Yung-nam Industrial High School (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) to the relevant industrial complex from the left side of the Defendant vehicle’s running along the said intersection to the right side of the C driver’s freight vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff vehicle”).

B. At the time of the occurrence of the foregoing traffic accident, the direction signal, etc. of the Defendant vehicle was a red signal, and the direction signal, etc. of the Plaintiff vehicle was a yellow signal.

In the above traffic accident, the defendant's vehicle suffered injuries such as spine damage, etc., which was displayed on the top of the plaintiff's vehicle by shocking the right side of the front part of the plaintiff's vehicle.

C. E is a worker employed by a subcontractor C with part of the construction work performed by the said company within F from a new construction industry corporation, and was at the work site, and was subject to the said traffic accident.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff paid KRW 17,00 as medical care benefits, KRW 18,268,250 as temporary layoff benefits, and KRW 28,185,30 as disability benefits, until September 10, 2015, to E in the workplace of a new construction industry corporation, which is an employer, under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

On the other hand, the defendant D non-life insurance company is an insurer which has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the defendant A on the defendant vehicle.

2. Determination

A. According to the occurrence of the obligation to pay indemnity and the recognition of the limitation of liability 1, Defendant D non-life insurance company, the insurer of Defendant A and Defendant vehicle, is obligated to compensate E for damages arising from the foregoing accident. The Plaintiff paid insurance benefits to E in relation to the foregoing accident as the operator of the industrial accident compensation insurance business.

arrow