1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a English teacher in the second-year English of a middle school, and the Defendant is a Korean language teacher in the same school, and the head of the second-year department.

B. On March 29, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Educational Right Protection Committee for the reasons that the Defendant, who had been engaged in the one language class in the second half of the second half of the second half of the year and the seventh of the year, did not seek the Plaintiff’s consent, and did not seek the Plaintiff’s consent, and would make it possible for him to do so. On April 15, 2019, the Committee recommended the Plaintiff to take a five-day special leave and provide counseling treatment.

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on suspicion of interference with business affairs, etc., and the office of the Pyeongtaek Housing Site was subject to a disposition of free suspicion in light of the statement circumstances, details, time, etc. on June 19, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, 9, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On March 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) opened the classroom, set up a S.C. and opened the classroom without prior notice or the Plaintiff’s consent; and (b) opened the curriculum at the next half of the classroom without the Plaintiff’s prior consent; (c) infringed the Plaintiff’s right to teach students; and (d) caused a serious insult.

Since April 1, 200, during the class of the first half of the second half of the second grade and the first half of the second grade and the first half of the second grade and the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day of the first day.

At that time, 'the same class of pene', and indirectly, the plaintiff suffered unstable and extreme stress on the plaintiff.

The defendant is obliged to compensate for consolation money of KRW 30 million and medical expenses of KRW 10 million for mental or physical damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort.

B. According to the evidence before the judgment, Gap evidence Nos. 10, Eul evidence Nos. 2 through 4 (including paper numbers), and the whole purport of the arguments, the defendant's somewhat slured sound (sluring, singing in the form of a book, etc.) in the next half of the plaintiff's class.