Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 15, 2014, the Defendant ordered the victim C, a business owner, to pay the normal drinking value from the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu as if he would normally pay the drinking value to the victim C, and was provided with 15,000 won, such as 19 sick, 1 inside a house, and 1 inside a house, and 15,000 won, such as 19,000 won, and 1 inside a house, from the victim who believed to be true.

2. On April 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) the Defendant did not pay the drinking value from the headline located in Young-gu, Young-si B on April 15, 2014; (b) and (c) thus, the police officer belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station D police station, Chungcheongnam-do, as a business owner’s report, sent to the site and asked the Defendant to verify his identity.

It is difficult for the Defendant to be dismissed that he was designated as a son due to the failure to pay a fine, and the friendly F’s resident registration number, which was a usual son, was put to E.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. On April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily accompanied the zone D (D) of the police station of the G-dong Dong-dong, Gi-dong, Gi-gu, Gi-gu, Gi-si; (b) demanded a policeman to affix his/her signature to “voluntary accompanying consent”; (c) without authority, stated “F” in the column of “voluntary accompanying consent” in the “written consent without authority to exercise the right,” and caused an impediment to the right hand hand of the right side.

For the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the voluntary consent letter of accompanying containing the portion of the private document in the name of friendly F on proof of fact without authority.

4. The Defendant: (a) forged a private document as stated in paragraph (3), at the time and place specified in paragraph (3); (b) forged the document; and (c) submitted the aforementioned “written consent to voluntary accompanying”; and (c) exercised the forged private document to D Raman E, who knew that the document was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement and statement;

1.F.