logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.24 2016고단6293
공무집행방해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On September 6, 2016, the Defendant received a voluntary request for accompanying to confirm the case from the police officer F, etc. of the police box affiliated with the Yongsan-dong Police Station E box, etc., sent by the witness after receiving a report from the witness 112 at the front of the D court and the front of the Defendant’s branch, which is located in the wife population C, around 16:30 on September 6, 2016, and voluntarily accompanied by the police box of the same Dong-dong Police Station E box.

피고인은 같은 날 16:58 경 용인시 처인구 G에 있는 용인 동부 경찰서 E 파출소 안에서, 술에 취하여 소란을 피우던 중 사건 경위 확인을 위해 피고인을 진정시키는 경위 F에게 “ 죽여 버린다” 고 욕설을 하며 발로 F의 다리와 팔을 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged.

1) The police officer, upon receiving a report 112, called out, separated the Defendant who was wraped with the Defendant’s branch and carried the Defendant to the E box nearest distance to investigate the situation of the case, etc.

2) The Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as taking a bath within the patrol vehicle and walking the inside of the vehicle, after getting on the patrol vehicle, and the police officer met the Defendant while getting off the vehicle.

3) The Defendant received a request from a police officer for a voluntary letter of consent to accompany within a police box and rejected it.

4) The Defendant, following her hand, was seated in a police box under the influence of the Defendant, and did not appear particularly her body or her violent attitude for a considerable time.

5) In order to correct the Defendant, F.C. F. F. F. the Defendant received the water by entering the water, and the Defendant appeared to have drinking water and walked the F’s bridge and f. B. The Defendant was able to walk the water and walked with the water cup.

arrow