logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단6512
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A crime committed on July 12, 2017;

A. On July 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:35, the Defendant: (b) operated the Mediflus Hospital in front of the Mediflus Hospital, which was located in the Maflus Hospital located in the Maflus Sin Sin Sin Sin Sin Sin-si, from the front day of the Maflus Hospital, to the front day of the Maflus Hospital located in 1161; (c) was suspected of drinking while driving the Bbs motor vehicle, and (d) controlled it to D with the police officer affiliated with the G police station in the Gandong Police Station in the Gandong-gu Office C, which was the Defendant’s pro-friendly E in order to

When the Defendant was found to have violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licensed Driving) due to the lack of a driver's license, he prepared a written statement using the tample, stating "E" in the sexual name column, and signed on the side of the name of E.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's document on fact proof for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. The Defendant exercised the above investigation document as if he were duly formed a forged statement with D who was aware of the forgery at the same place.

2. A crime committed on July 26, 2017;

A. On July 26, 2017, around 10:45, the Defendant: (a) was driving a private document from the front of the Kelel apartment apartment located in the Yeladong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, to the high chill road located in the same Goel-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and the Defendant was under control against D, due to the wear of the safety labelling car, and was working as the Defendant’s pro-friendly E in order not to raise the fact that he is serving a fine.

When the Defendant was found to have violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licensed Driving) due to the lack of a driver's license, he prepared a written statement using the tample, stating "E" in the sexual name column, and signed on the side of the name of E.

Accordingly, the defendant forged another person's document on fact proof for the purpose of exercising the right.

(b).

arrow