The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the resident of the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City apartment, and the victim D is the representative of the occupant of the above apartment.

A. At around 16:50 on February 2, 2015, the Defendant posted a three-dimensional letter on the Defendant’s home located in the above apartment site 112-2201, a computer to “a advice to D president” on the (E) Freedom bulletin board of the above apartment site, and the victim actually promoted one specific employee, despite that the Defendant did not have any fact, the Defendant visited F, who is the managing body, and was at the early January 201, the Chairperson visited F, who was the managing body, to be promoted to the facility.

The sole action against the rejection of the meeting of the occupants' representatives is null and void, and it is again requested to return to the original state.

In addition, although the actual victim did not take part in the improper personnel management of the management staff, there is a question that the head of the community does not conclude the contract again by exercising personnel pressure against F, the managing body, in December of the year, despite the absence of the actual victim’s involvement in the management staff, the head of the community team eventually resigned as an act of inducing the resignation of the boiler’s appointment allowance (10,000 won) paid to the head of the community team to stop the payment of the boiler appointment allowance (10,000 won) and to divide it to other boiler employees, and eventually, the head of the community team retired from the facility.

It is the chairperson for whom he is the apartment and why this is followed by our apartment.

Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

Power shall be short.

As such, the president of the apartment representative now participates in unfair personnel affairs.

by posting the phrase “the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

B. On February 6, 2015, around 18:56, the Defendant used a computer from the above Defendant’s office to use it on the bulletin board of the above apartment website.