logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.20 2016구합65085
손실보상금
Text

1. The part of the lawsuit in this case concerning the claim for compensation for the loss of the remaining land value shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Causes and results of adjudication and appraisal;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Road Project (B) - Public notice: C - Project operator announced by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on April 30, 2014 - Defendant:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on June 25, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”) - The object of expropriation: Ischeon-si Dri (hereinafter “Duri”) E 786m2 (hereinafter “instant land”): Compensation for losses: KRW 365,568,600 (the Plaintiff is the remainder land of this case) (hereinafter “the remainder land”).

- The Central Land Tribunal did not accept the remaining land for its original purpose on the ground that it is substantially difficult to use it for its original purpose) - The date of expropriation: The date of expropriation: The appraisal corporation on August 18, 2015 - The appraisal corporation and the appraisal corporation on the Adol appraisal corporation and the appraisal corporation white.

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection (hereinafter “instant objection”) on May 26, 2016 - Compensation for losses: 379,127,100 won (the Plaintiff filed an objection to compensation for the decline in the value of the remaining land, but the Central Land Tribunal rejected this part of the objection, and the objection to the claim for the expropriation of the remaining land was dismissed) - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation in Sam Chang Chang and Chang and an appraisal corporation in the wedding day (hereinafter “appraisal”) (hereinafter “appraisal”)

(d) Results of appraiser G’s appraisal (hereinafter “court appraisal”): Indemnity for the instant land - Contents of appraisal: 387,969,600 won (based on recognition) without dispute; descriptions of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2; Eul evidence Nos. 1-1 through 1-7; Results of appraiser G’s appraisal; the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 that the compensation for losses incurred under the instant judgment was significantly less than the market price of the instant land, and thus, the Defendant was at the time of the Plaintiff’s reasonable compensation and objection ruling.

arrow