logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.18 2012구합4778
손실보상금
Text

1. The defendant 15,390,380 won to the plaintiff A, 819,00 won to the plaintiff B, 6,169,700 won to the plaintiff C, and 16,455 won to the plaintiff D.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Road project (Misung-Cheongbuk Road Construction Project (Secondary; hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice E published on October 16, 2009 - Project implementer: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation by October 28, 2011 - The land subject to expropriation is as indicated below the “land subject to expropriation” located in Pyeongtaek-si F.

(hereinafter referred to as “each land to be expropriated in this case”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: December 21, 2011 - Compensation for losses: The following “amount of adjudication on expropriation” shall be stated.

- With respect to the claim for expropriation and depreciation of the remaining land: The plaintiff A filed a claim for expropriation of the remaining vinyls on the ground of G, but the Central Land Expropriation Committee rejected the claim on the ground that it seems possible to use them for the previous purpose in consideration of the fact that the area is relatively wide and other vinyls for the same purpose as the surrounding area exist.

- An appraisal corporation: a large appraisal corporation and a sight appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on March 16, 2012 - Compensation for losses: The phrase “this ruling” as listed below is indicated.

- With respect to the plaintiffs' claim for compensation for depreciation of their remaining land, (1) the Central Land Expropriation Committee did not accept the claim for compensation for depreciation of their respective remaining land, on the ground that the project in this case does not confirm that there is a fall in the value of the remaining land due to the project in consideration of the size, location, form, and current use of the remaining land.

(2) Plaintiff A’s remaining plastic houses were rejected to the same effect as the acceptance ruling.

- Certified public appraisal corporations: two or more certified public appraisal corporations and greenhouse gas appraisal corporations;

D. The result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal of appraiser H - Compensation for losses: The amount of the court’s appraisal indicated below is as follows.

The appraisal value of the land to be expropriated by the owner shall be the location of the court's appraisal value.

arrow