1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The court below's findings of facts and judgments that rejected the plaintiff's claim on September 2, 2015, on the ground that the plaintiff's appeal did not significantly differ from the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and even if all evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, stress or occupational treatment recognized as a body-related or injured person on September 22, 2015 or as an unfair treatment of knenenee under stress or occupational stress or these circumstances cannot be deemed to have been caused by this case's injury). 2. Thus, the court below's determination of facts and judgments that rejected the plaintiff's claim on September 2, 2015 are justifiable, and therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.