The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. The Plaintiff asserts, as the grounds of appeal, that “The Plaintiff’s additional determination by this court has aggravated ties and adjacent values due to the loss of an infant recognized as an existing injury on duty, which is caused by an accident during the instant training or subsequent legacy therefrom. In addition, it is reasonable to assess the length by adding up the length to 4 cm since the reflect of 80m in total is observed on the inner part of the present inner part, and the head of the right side of the left side of the snow and the head of the cross direction reflects each other on the adjacent part.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence submitted in this court (A7-1, 2, and 6) are examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.