logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 02. 23. 선고 2016두58024 판결
(심리불속행) 부동산 양도시 중개인이 있는 경우 중개수수료가 발생하는 것이므로 필요경비로 인정됨[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2016Nu44898 ( October 11, 2016)

Title

(In case of the transfer of real estate, if there is an intermediary, the intermediary fee is generated, and therefore, it is considered as necessary expenses.

Summary

(In the event of the transfer of real estate in which the broker is appointed, the payment of the brokerage fee shall not be considered as the statement of the broker with a certain level of brokerage commission compared to the amount of the general transaction and shall not be rejected as necessary.

Related statutes

Article 97 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2016Du58024 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff

○ ○

Defendant

Head of Yongsan Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

February 23, 2017

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is recognized that the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Grounds for Appeal are not included or are groundless. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act by the assent of all participating Justices

arrow