The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for forgery of private documents, etc. in the support for the development of the Suwon method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2016.

"2016 Highest 7880"

1. On May 18, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) kept mobile phones prior to the mobile phone sales store of “D” in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around May 18, 2015 while opening the cell phone.

E’s written application for lele mobile membership in the place by using E’s identification card pictures was written as “E”, “F” in the customer name column, “E” in the address column, “E” in the Gyeonggi-do Goyang-si, Seoyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, and “E” and “E” in the E’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged an application form in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. The Defendant at the time, at the same time, and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, delivered a copy of the above “D” application form in the name of this E, which was forged, to an employee under the name of the said “D”, and exercised the said document.

"2017 Highest 546"

1. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document, which was in custody of the victim H’s identification card pictures at an insular place, opened a mobile phone in the victim’s name with an additional opening of the mobile phone in the victim’s name, and had the middle and high-ranking business operator sell it.

Accordingly, the Defendant re-transmissioned the victim’s identification card to J, the owner of the mobile phone, “I,” which was kept in custody at the above date and at the above location, the Defendant stated that “H’s 64GB cell phone opening 64GB cell phone in the name of H.”

Therefore, the Defendant, at the same time, made the J enter into the SK Telecom application, which is kept in the same place as “H,” “L,” “M,” “N,” and “H” to the applicant’s customer column, and made the applicant’s signature arbitrarily on his/her name.

The defendant is entitled to exercise.