logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고정744
주민등록법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On February 3, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for the re-issuance of his/her resident registration certificate at the Suwon-gu Community Service Center B in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and submitted another person’s photograph to apply for false facts as to the resident registration certificate.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the Defendant applied for the re-issuance of his/her resident registration certificate on February 3, 2015 and submitted a photograph of C, not his/her photograph; (b) the relevant public official issued his/her resident registration certificate without knowledge of the fact; (c) the Defendant found it on February 16, 2015; (d) the Defendant did not immediately raise an objection even though he/she knew that he/she was mistakenly submitted a photograph immediately after the issuance of his/her resident registration certificate; and (iv) the Defendant submitted his/her photograph upon filing an application for re-issuance of his/her resident registration certificate on January 12, 2016; and (v) the public official in charge found that the photograph submitted at the time of the application for re-issuance was not the Defendant’s photograph; and (v)

When filing an application for re-issuance of a resident registration certificate, the Defendant had no photograph of the principal.

Hh asserts that the photograph of the birth C is only the presentation of a photograph of the birth, and that it does not intentionally apply for false facts.

According to the records, the following circumstances, i.e., that C has taken pictures of the defendant as a commemorative picture taken on February 2015, 2015.

A written statement to the effect that the person himself/herself does not have any private interest due to his/her identification card, and ② the Defendant did not immediately raise an objection and file an application for re-issuance for a period of not more than one year on February 2015, the Defendant did not immediately make a statement to the effect that he/she obtained a resident registration certificate, but did not immediately make a statement because he/she is in custody of another person’s photograph when he/she received a resident registration certificate, or that he/she did not make a false statement, and there is a driver’s license.

arrow