The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On October 18, 2010, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant (B) who is the husband of the Defendant’s case No. 2010No797 of the said court at the court of law No. 621, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, U.S.A. and took an oath after being notified of the right to refuse to testify.

The Defendant testified to the question of the Defendant (B), “I see that the police officer was tending to be tending on the floor, I would like to go beyond the time when she talked.” The Defendant continued to reply to the question of the Defendant (B), “I would like to see whether the police officer, who was in the A-I-I-I-I-I-I-be, sees two strings with a view to leaving the vehicle back to the rear, and going beyond the floor, and immediately, the police officer went up on the floor when I am up to the floor so that the Defendant (B) would go up to this shock, I asked the Defendant (B)’s question, “I asked the Defendant (B), but the video was not the voice of the Defendant (B),” and “I asked the Prosecutor’s testimony as “I will continue to answer the question of the Prosecutor’s “I”.

However, at around 23:03 on June 27, 2009, the Defendant, on the 23:03, was carrying the car on the wing Chief and driving the car, and was under the influence of drinking from the border E, etc. belonging to the D District of the Chungcheong Police Station D District of the Chungcheong Police Station while driving the car behind the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building B,

Accordingly, the defendant, as a witness who has taken an oath, made a false statement contrary to his memory, and perjury.

2. In light of the following circumstances as a whole, the Prosecutor submitted the evidence duly adopted and examined.