Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 11, 2016, the Defendant’s insultd the Defendant on the ground that the entrance door, which was digitalized in front of his own residence B B B 302, was not opened, around December 11, 2016, and that the door door was emitted from the door, and the victim D, a police officer of the Madern Police Station C police station, dispatched to the Defendant upon receipt of a report 112, was called “Isson.”
With the hearing of the Defendant’s wife E and neighbors, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring “Ara, cryp shots, flussing, flusing, and flusing as flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium,” which is called as “A, flusium, flusium, and flusium
2. The Defendant, at the date and time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, stated that the Defendant d was spiting, spiting, or blocking the patrol vehicle from proceeding in front of the patrol vehicle at the front of the patrol vehicle, that it was about to operate the patrol vehicle by getting on the patrol vehicle and operating the patrol vehicle. The Defendant drownd, spit, or obstructed the patrol vehicle from proceeding on the front of the patrol vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Each police statement made to F or D;
1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;
1. A report on investigation (a statement by a reporter);
1. Application of each statute on photographs;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Act appears to be the defendant's attitude to confession and reflect his/her crime, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than a fine, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc.