Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

(F) The sentence of the original court (7 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to take into account the fact that the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor due to the accident in this case, and that the vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, while causing a traffic accident, leaving the scene of the accident without taking any relief measures against the victim, and the liability for the crime is not easy. Furthermore, if the Defendant, around September 7, 2013, which was 2 months before the date of the crime of this case, went away from the scene without taking necessary measures even after destroying and damaging the signal control apparatus owned by the viewing of the Dallan as it was, the Defendant committed the crime of this case in spite of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident), and all other sentencing conditions such as Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, motive, crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.