1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On February 9, 2001, the Plaintiff acquired a driver’s license (Class 1 common) on February 9, 2001 (the Plaintiff acquired a driver’s license on December 19, 199, in the event that a person was able to drive while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol level of 0.181% on December 19, 199.

B. On February 20, 2020, around 21:06, the Plaintiff met the front door of the sprink car (hereinafter “victim’s vehicle”) that was driven by the first line of the road on which the Plaintiff was trying to enter while driving bypassing the C-II truck on the roads front of the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Sinyang-si. (Around February 20, 2020, the Plaintiff continued to drive the damaged vehicle without stopping. As a result, the Plaintiff sprinked the driver of the damaged vehicle (hereinafter “victim”) about two weeks of medical treatment, and caused considerable damage to the damaged vehicle.

C. On April 14, 2020, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s driver’s license on the ground that: (a) caused the instant accident without any relief measures; (b) left the site without reporting it; and (c) left the site.

(Disqualified Period from May 5, 2020 to May 4, 2024; hereinafter “instant disposition”). D.

On April 24, 2020, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but filed it with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission.

6.23. was dismissed.

E. On the other hand, with respect to the instant accident, the Plaintiff was charged with the Defendant’s High Government District Court 2020Kadan816 and was sentenced to imprisonment.

[Identification Evidence: Evidence No. 1, 2, 3, Evidence No. 1 to 15]

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion ① Around 200 meters away from the illegal parked vehicles at the time of the instant accident, and went to the scene of the accident after leaving the vehicle again after leaving the vehicle again. However, the Plaintiff left the vehicle on the ground that 3 men of the YY and the borrower of the damaged vehicle are in common, and there were no yellow dust, and the vehicle was voluntarily present at the police station on the following day.

. The victim.