All the judgment below is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

(b).

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that as to the defendants of the judgment of the court below as to each punishment (two years of suspended sentence in the year of imprisonment for eight months, one hundred and twenty hours of community service work, six months of imprisonment for defendant B, and a fine of seven hundred and five million won for defendant C: the defendant A and B are too unlimited, and the prosecutor is too unfford and unfair.

2. We examine the part of the criminal escape and the criminal escape ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant A, B, and the prosecutor.

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant B and C filed a complaint for evasion of compulsory execution from I around October 2013; (b) around that time, the Defendants: (c) requested that “A sell the instant call text from C to the actual 150 million won; and (d) from that time, A made a false statement with the police officer in charge of the instant complaint case to the effect that “A shall actually operate the call text,” and (e) consented that “A shall have the said call text from May 2013 to the actual 150 million won; and (e) made a false statement with the police officer in charge of the instant complaint case on January 3, 2014; and (e) made a false statement with the purport of having the said police officer in charge of the instant case purchase KRW 150 million from that time to that time; and (e) made a false statement with the purport of having the said police officer in charge of the instant call text to the effect that B and the Defendant 214.

After that, A shall do so on September 18, 2014 as requested by it.